Friday, February 14, 2020

Ambidexterity in an organization Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Ambidexterity in an organization - Essay Example Ambidexterity requires an enormous amount of altruistic effort on the part of managers. The basic question that addresses a manager’s motivation is â€Å"What is in it for me†. Operation manager’s motivation is limited to meeting his deadline and exceeding his rated capacity to ensure that he delivers what is required, when it is required. Thus, his impetus is ensuring efficiency and maximizing capacity. While business unit managers are expected to deliver revenues that can cover pricing schedule configuration and marketing at times it can be an introduction of related products if not an entirely different set of products all together. The survey in itself failed to take into consideration the difference in the terms of reference between operational managers and business unit managers. The level of expectation in terms of performance and output as well as the requirement and scope of the job is very wide. Operational manager’s realm of influence is only limited within his domain, its efficiency, continuity of operation during emergencies and its adherence to the quality and volume demanded by the company. Therefore an operation manager’s decision making authority is limited within his area of responsibility it would be incredulous to expect him to have dominion over other parts of the company. An operations manager’s personal coordinating mechanism is limited to his vendors, the source department where his input is coming from, and the destination of his output. Operations managers being a service provider in a company are expected to adhere to the quality standards of the company as well as to the standard work instructions as required by their internal clients. Business unit managers are expected to be ambidextrous since their success is directly correlated to their creativity. If operations managers are back-office and support

Saturday, February 1, 2020

U.S. One China Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

U.S. One China Policy - Essay Example Before focusing on the one-China policy, it is important to discuss first the history of relations between Taiwan and the PRC. Prior to the 17th century, aborigines from Taiwan mainly inhabited the Island of Taiwan. However, with the successive waves of migration by the Han Chinese, the demographics of the island started to change. In 1662, Taiwan was brought under Ming loyalist Zheng Chenggong’s control, prior to incorporation in 1683 into part of the Qing Dynasty (Tunsjà ¸ 92). The Dutch also briefly colonized Taiwan between 1624 and 1662, while the Spanish ruled Northern Taiwan between 1626 and 1642. Between 1895 and 1945, Taiwan was under colonial rule from the Japanese with the French also briefly ruling Northern Taiwan between 1884 and 1885. Under the Qing Dynasty, Taiwan existed as a prefecture of the province of Fuji as part of the Chinese government from 1683 up to 1887. In 1887, Taiwan became a separate province of China. It remained a province of China until 1895 a t which point the Treaty of Shimonoseki ceded authority over Taiwan to the Japanese (Tunsjà ¸ 92).   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   After Japan had surrendered in Taipei in 1945, The Republic of China took over the role of governing polity in Taiwan under the KMT in a period that was characterized as a military occupation. However, the government of the Republic of China lost control in 1949 over the Chinese mainland after the Civil War on the mainland (Tunsjà ¸ 93)o 93). Since this was prior to the implementation of treaties made after the Second World War, the KMT withdrew to Taiwan that was still technically a territory of the Japanese. This exiled government under Chiang Kai-shek took over authority of Taiwan and avowed the Island was under martial law. After the renunciation of rights to Taiwanese territory through a peace treaty signed in San Francisco by the Japanese, Taiwan’s sovereignty was put under question. Neither the Treaty of San Francisco nor the Japanese-Chinese treaty dealt with the issue of Taiwan’s territorial sovereignty and its awar d to the KMT representing the Republic of China (Tunsjo 94). The governing body of the Republic of China is still the government in Taiwan with a transformation in the 90s towards democracy as the government lifted the martial law it had imposed in 1949. Since then, the political and legal status bequeathed on Taiwan has become an issue of contention and controversy with sentiments of Taiwan’s independence become more public and gaining some level of international support. At this point, it becomes important to discuss the role of the US in PRC-ROC relations, especially given that Taiwan is the second highest buyer of American made products after Canada. With the tensions between the PRC and the ROC, the United States has had to come up with a policy that allows it to continue relations with both territories. The one-China policy in the United State’s case was initially drafted in 1972 through the Shanghai Communique