UKs Policy on Training and Development Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

UKs Policy on Training and Development - Essay ExampleThis is a very important feature of the UK government policy on training on development. UK pull up stakes progressively introduce a new loan facility , which bequeath remove grant funding from the 2013/14 schoolman year, providing the capacity to sustain learner participation with government-backed lean loans for individuals aged 24 or over studying at qualifications at level 3 and preceding(prenominal) (BIS 2010a, p. 4). BIS (2010a, p. 4) elaborated there will be no up-front costs and the repayments made on an income-contingent basis. In addition, the government has made available 129m in 2013-14 and 398m in 2014-15 for these fee loans (BIS 2010a, p. 4).The BIS claims, however, that while public investment will be reduced, the UK government will free the sector from top-down targets and direction to enable a truly demand-led schema to develop (2010a, p. 4). Government will seek great contributions from individuals and emp loyers who benefit most and can afford to pay (BIS 2010a, p. 4). For 2011-12, the total Teaching and Learning budget will be 3.1bn, of which 605m will be earmarked for adult apprenticeships (BIS 2010a, p. 4). However, sp shuttinging on adult apprenticeships and, relative to the previous government, will increase by up to 250m by the end of the SR period (BIS 2010a, p. 4). Informal adult and community learning will be retained although they will be reformed (BIS 2010a, p. 4). There will withal be progression routes for those looking for a way into formal learning (BIS 2010a, p. 4). Importantly, there will also be help for those who are unemployed on active benefits (BIS 2010a, p. 5). ... 4). There will also be progression routes for those looking for a way into formal learning (BIS 2010a, p. 4). Importantly, there will also be help for those who are unemployed on active benefits (BIS 2010a, p. 5). The UK government policy on training and development comes with fundamental policy cha nges (BIS 2010a, p. 5). The Train to Gain will be abolished (BIS 2010a, p. 5). Funding for workplace training on SMEs will be prioritized (BIS 2010a, p. 5). Government will more conduct consultations for other changes (BIS 2010a, p. 5). BIS (2010a, p. 5) pointed out that government will reduce bureaucracy by training providers and simplify the further education and skills landscape by abolishing central targets. For example, the BIS (2010b) document localized targets and programs for England based on BIS (2010a). The BIS (2010a, p. 5) verbalise colleges and training organisations will be more publicly accountable to learners, employers, and their communities. This portion of the UK government program will be supported by the introduction of womb-to-tomb learning accounts and by the new All Age Careers Service. As per the claim of the BIS, the UK government training and development policy is founded on three principles (BIS 2010a, p. 1) fairness, shared accountability, and greater freedom. According to BIS (2010, p. 1), the first principle justifies the special attention to young people and those with basic literacy and numeracy skills. In the second principle, citizens will be called upon to take greater responsibility for ensuring their own skills are met (BIS 2010a, p. 1). Lastly, the principle of greater freedom means trusting people to do their job and the primary